Skip to main content

Homoeopathy Act, No. 7 of 1970

The Homoeopathy Act, No. 7 of 1970 was enacted to provide for the registration and regulation of homoeopathic practitioners in Sri Lanka. It established the Homoeopathic Council as a body corporate, created a registration framework with a grandfather clause for existing practitioners, and set up a dedicated Homoeopathic Fund.

Repealed

This Act was repealed in its entirety by Section 50 of the Homoeopathy Act, No. 10 of 2016. The 1970 Act was never amended during its 46-year lifespan — it was replaced wholesale by the 2016 Act, which established a new Homoeopathic Council under modernized governance provisions. All information below describes the repealed framework.

Source

Full text: Homoeopathy Act No. 7 of 1970 (HTML — Lanka Law) | Replacement: Homoeopathy Act No. 10 of 2016 (PDF — documents.gov.lk) | ~50 sections. No amendments. Repealed 2016.

Act Structure

SectionsTopicSummary
S.2-26Homoeopathic CouncilEstablishes the Council as a body corporate; composition, powers, meetings, staff
S.22-23Examinations & DiplomasCouncil may conduct qualifying examinations and grant diplomas
S.27-34Registration of PractitionersRegistration requirements, qualifications, register maintenance, grandfather clause
S.35-37Discipline & PrivilegesExclusive privileges for registered practitioners (S.35); disciplinary inquiries, removal from register
S.39Homoeopathic FundDedicated fund: registration fees, fines, government grants
S.40+General ProvisionsOffences, penalties, regulations, interpretation

Key Sections

SectionTopicSummary
2Council establishedCreates the Homoeopathic Council as a body corporate with perpetual succession
3-4CompositionCouncil membership and chairperson
22-23ExaminationsCouncil may conduct examinations and grant diplomas for homoeopathic practice
27RegistrationQualifications required for registration as a homoeopathic practitioner
29Grandfather clausePractitioners practising before the Act's commencement eligible for registration
35Exclusive privilegesOnly registered practitioners may practise homoeopathy and use the title
37Disciplinary controlCouncil may remove practitioners from register after inquiry
39Homoeopathic FundDedicated fund for the Council's operations

Statutory Bodies

0 Legally Active1 Obsolete
Homoeopathic CouncilObsoleteS.2-26
Organisation/statutory-body

Homoeopathic Council (S.2-26)

Established by Section 2 as a body corporate with perpetual succession and a common seal. The Council was the sole statutory body under the Act, responsible for all regulatory functions related to homoeopathic practice.

Key functions:

  • Registration of homoeopathic practitioners (S.27+)
  • Conducting qualifying examinations and granting diplomas (S.22-23)
  • Maintaining the register of practitioners (S.27-34)
  • Disciplinary inquiries and removal from register (S.35-37)
  • Prescribing qualifications for registration
  • Administering the Homoeopathic Fund (S.39)

Administrative Collapse: The Council reportedly experienced significant governance difficulties over the decades, eventually becoming defunct. Its functions were managed by interim committees appointed by the Minister, undermining the institutional framework and motivating the decision to replace the entire Act in 2016 rather than simply amending it.

Repealed Body

The Homoeopathic Council established under this Act has been superseded by the new Council established under the Homoeopathy Act, No. 10 of 2016. Practitioners registered under the 1970 Act were protected by transitional provisions in the 2016 Act.

Registration Framework

The Act established a registration system for homoeopathic practitioners with three pathways to registration:

PathwaySectionRequirement
Qualifying examinationS.27Pass Council examination and hold recognized qualifications
Recognized degreeS.27Hold a degree from a recognized institution
Grandfather clauseS.29Practising homoeopathy before the Act commenced

Exclusive Privileges (S.35)

Section 35 granted registered practitioners exclusive rights:

  • Only registered practitioners could practise homoeopathy
  • Only registered practitioners could use the title "homoeopathic practitioner" or equivalent
  • Practising without registration was an offence under the Act

Disciplinary Provisions (S.35-37)

The Council had power to:

  • Conduct disciplinary inquiries into professional misconduct
  • Remove practitioners from the register
  • Hear appeals from practitioners aggrieved by registration decisions

Homoeopathic Fund (S.39)

Section 39 established a dedicated Homoeopathic Fund to finance the Council's operations. Revenue sources included:

  • Registration fees paid by practitioners
  • Fines imposed under the Act
  • Government grants and donations
  • Any other moneys lawfully received by the Council

The Repeal — Act No. 10 of 2016

After 46 years without any amendments, the Homoeopathy Act of 1970 was repealed in its entirety by Section 50 of the Homoeopathy Act, No. 10 of 2016. This is a rare approach in Sri Lankan legislative practice — most acts are amended incrementally rather than replaced wholesale.

Why replacement rather than amendment?

  • The original Council had become administratively defunct
  • Governance was being managed by interim committees, not the statutory Council
  • The 1970 framework was fundamentally outdated after 46 years
  • Comprehensive modernization was needed rather than piecemeal fixes

Key changes in the 2016 Act:

Feature1970 Act2016 Act
Council governanceOriginal provisions; became defunctModernized governance structure
RegistrationBasic frameworkUpdated requirements and categories
OversightLimited ministerial oversightEnhanced accountability provisions
TransitionalProtects rights of practitioners registered under 1970 Act
Legislative Pattern

The 1970 Homoeopathy Act's repeal-and-replace pattern contrasts with the Ayurveda Act (No. 31 of 1961), which took the opposite approach — three incremental amendments over 62 years (1969, 1977, 2023) rather than wholesale replacement. Both Acts regulate traditional medicine under the same Ministry, but their legislative evolution diverged significantly.

Amendment Timeline

1961
Ayurveda Act enacted
Act No. 31 of 1961 established the regulatory framework for Ayurveda, Siddha, Unani, and Desiya Chikitsa. Homoeopathy was not covered, creating a regulatory gap that the 1970 Act was designed to fill.
1970
Homoeopathy Act enacted
Act No. 7 of 1970, certified to provide for the registration and regulation of homoeopathic practitioners. Established the Homoeopathic Council as a body corporate, a registration system for practitioners, and the Homoeopathic Fund. Approximately 50 sections.
1980
Homoeopathic Regulations
Subsidiary regulations made under the Act to prescribe procedural matters for the Council and registration requirements. Exact gazette reference not confirmed.
2000
Administrative difficulties reported
The Homoeopathic Council reportedly experienced significant governance challenges over the decades. The Council became effectively defunct, and its functions were managed by interim committees appointed by the Minister, undermining the institutional framework.
2016
Replacement Act enacted
The Homoeopathy Act, No. 10 of 2016 was enacted as a complete replacement, repealing the 1970 Act in its entirety under Section 50. The new Act established a modernized Homoeopathic Council with improved governance provisions, addressing the administrative collapse of the original Council.
2016
Transitional provisions
The 2016 Act included transitional provisions to protect the rights of practitioners registered under the repealed 1970 Act and to ensure continuity of the Council's regulatory functions during the transition to the new framework.

No amendments. The Act was repealed in its entirety by Act No. 10 of 2016 after 46 years without any amendments.

Entity Relationships & Governance

Governance Hierarchy (1952 Design)

Level 1: Minister of Health (or Indigenous Medicine)ObsoleteNational
Policy authority: appointed Council members, approved regulations, gave directions to the Council
Level 2: Homoeopathic CouncilObsoleteNational
Body corporate (S.2): registration and regulation of homoeopathic practitioners, examinations, disciplinary control
Level 3: Homoeopathic FundObsoleteNational
Dedicated fund (S.39): financed Council operations from registration fees, fines, and government grants
Level 3: Registered Homoeopathic PractitionersObsoleteNational
Registered under S.27+: practitioners holding recognized qualifications or registered under the grandfather clause

Current Replacement Structure (Post-1989)

Level 1: NationalNational
Functions transferred to the new Homoeopathic Council established under the Homoeopathy Act, No. 10 of 2016
Level 2: ProvincialProvincial
No provincial-level governance under this Act — all regulation was centralized
Level 3: RegionalRegional
No regional-level governance under this Act
Level 4: LocalLocal
Individual registered practitioners — registration now governed by the 2016 Act

Data Confidence

Legislative Framework
medium
Historical Details
low
Current Operational Status
high

Cross-References

Related ActRelationship
Ayurveda Act, No. 31 of 1961Parallel traditional medicine regulation; the 1970 Homoeopathy Act filled a gap for homoeopathic practice not covered by the Ayurveda Act
Homoeopathy Act, No. 10 of 2016Replacement Act — repealed the 1970 Act in its entirety under Section 50; established new Homoeopathic Council

Research Gaps

  • Council composition: exact number of members, quorum, and term length require access to the original 1970 Act text (partially accessible via Lanka Law HTML)
  • Administrative collapse timeline: exact dates and circumstances of the Council becoming defunct are not publicly documented — available only through ministerial records
  • Practitioner statistics: number of practitioners registered under the 1970 Act at the time of repeal is not confirmed
  • Homoeopathic Fund: financial records and accounts of the Fund are not publicly accessible
  • 1980 Regulations: gazette reference for subsidiary regulations made under the Act is not confirmed
  • 2016 transitional provisions: full details of how practitioners were transferred to the new register require the complete text of the 2016 Act
  • Data confidence: legislative framework is rated "medium" (limited access to original Act), historical details are rated "low" (administrative history not publicly documented), current operational status is rated "high" (repeal is confirmed)